Martyrs’ Sacrificed Even in Death

A martyr is generally someone who is deeply attached to a cause, belief or faith and is willing to sacrifice for the sake of it. A true martyr does not even shy away from death, the ultimate sacrifice, to protect and propagate  whatever it is they believe in. Within the context of this very simple definition, it may already dawn on you the number of times and ways the word martyr has been used, misused and certainly abused in Lebanon and the Arab region. Not every person killed is a martyr, because not every person has a cause or is killed because of it. Not dying a martyr doesn’t make a death any less tragic, it’s just that not every human being that is killed is and should be considered a martyr.

I bring this up because today is Martyr’s Day in Lebanon. On a day like this in 1916, Ottoman ruler Jamal Pasha, known as the Butcher, ordered the execution of Lebanese (and Syrian) nationalists seeking the help of the French to free their land from Ottoman rule. I doubt many people can name all 13 who were executed in what is now Martyrs’ Square, which is another feature many martyrs have in common, anonymity. They’re like real soldiers sometimes, most people don’t know their names and will never see their faces, but know they did something noble, for the sake of a higher cause.

FullSizeRender

I bring this up because today is supposed to be a national holiday to celebrate our martyrs, those from 1916 and from earlier and later years, those known and unknown, including press martyrs who played a part in forming and safeguarding the place we now call Lebanon. Unfortunately, the national holiday was cancelled, by a certain Prime Minister Fouad Siniora during his tenure (2005-2009). The fact that I do not recall the reason given to cancel the holiday is probably the biggest proof that it was a petty one. Whether Martyr’s Day was sacrificed (no pun intended) no reduce overall holidays, replace it with another holiday, or cancel it at the expense of keeping the Christian/Muslim holiday balance is irrelevant. It just needs to be reinstated if this country has any respect for itself and those who died for it.

It saddens me deeply to believe that cancelling this holiday may have come at the expense of installing a new one, that of February 14 for the so-called Rafik Hariri Memorial Day instead.  The day former Prime Minister Hariri was assassinated, the so-called martyr of Lebanon, has thus been immortalized, set in stone at the expense of all other patriots for no reason whatsoever. This isn’t about being with or against Hariri, his policies, vision or legacy, because as he used to say, Lebanon is bigger than anybody (even Hariri himself). This is about correcting an error and the slight misunderstanding that Hariri and his kind hold dear, that Beirut and Lebanon’s history started with them, and before them little is worth mentioning or preserving.  Therefore, for whoever considers Hariri a martyr, let him also be remembered on May 6 like all the others. And for those who don’t, he will be respectfully remembered as yet another politician with the misfortune of being tragically assassinated in a country that fails to provide justice to its people.

Our martyrs are sacrificed, even in death…

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Arab World, Lebanese Politics, Lebanon, Martyrs Day, May 6 and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Martyrs’ Sacrificed Even in Death

  1. Lloyd Baroody says:

    My father, who died in 1979, was born in 1905. When he was young, he told me about the people executed by the Ottomans on Martyr’s Square. He was there, and he said it left a lasting impression on him. Regarding the matter in your blog, it doesn’t surprise me about Former Prime Minister Siniora’s desire to replace Martyr’s Day with Hariri Day. Siniora worships Hariri, never failing in a speech to idolize his late colleague, who no doubt was a giant of a man in Lebanon’s history. However I think that he was quite biased and misguided to have replaced commemoration of an important part of Lebanon’s origins with remembrance of an individual, an action which many in Lebanon could have viewed as partisan given the current political dynamic in the country. It is ironic that there is no history book in Lebanese schools covering the events since the start of the civil war. There are those in Lebanon who can’t even admit to calling it a civil war. The after-effects of the civil somewhat remain, and they will do so until all of us alive during that time are dead. The Siniora move to change the holiday simply adds fuel the sectarian tinderbox that Lebanon is today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s